Logo-npj
Submitted: 29 Jan 2017
Accepted: 04 Apr 2017
ePublished: 15 Apr 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Nephropharmacol. 2017;6(2): 79-84.
doi: 10.15171/npj.2017.09
  Abstract View: 9863
  PDF Download: 4838
  Full Text View: 8

Original

Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B as medical expulsive therapy following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteric stones; a randomized clinical trial

Sadrollah Mehrabi 1, Leila Manzouri 1*, Asieh Kohzadi 2, Farhad Mehrabi 3

1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
3 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding author: Leila Manzouri, , Email: manzourileila@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Urolithiasis is one of the most common disorders of urinary system.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B.


Patients and Methods:
This study was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted
in Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2014 to 2015. After taking informed consent,
a total of 64 patients aged 18 years and over, presenting with renal or upper ureteral stones up
to 20 mm in diameter were enrolled in this study. After extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
(SWL), patients were randomly assigned to group A (n = 32) received tamsulosin 0.4 mg and
group B (n = 32) received tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus lithorex-B 400 mg orally at bed time daily for
2 weeks. Finally, patients were assessed by KUB and sonography. The stone passage rate, drug
adverse effects and pain score were evaluated. All data were analyzed using SPSS 21.

Results: There were no significant differences between group A and B regarding stone
expulsion rates (40.6% vs 43.7%, P = 0.83), adverse effects (34.4% vs 40.6%, P = 0.79) and mean
score of pain (4.31 ± 2.02 vs 5 ± 2.01, P = 0.17) after 2 weeks follow up. Primary stone size was
the predicting factor of stone passage (β = -0.42, P = 0.005, Exp (β) = 0.65, CI 95%, Exp (β):
0.48-0.88).

Conclusion: Tamsulosin plus lithorex-B is safe and well tolerated with no extra benefit
regarding the expulsion rate in 2 weeks follow up. Hence, the necessity of conducting a trial
with a longer follow up period providing comparison between tamsulosin and lithorex-B in
separate group is felt.


Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

Further studies are necessary to provide comparison between tamsulosin and lithorex-B in separate groups for deciding about
treatment with lithorex-B.

Please cite this paper as: Mehrabi S, Manzouri L, Kohzadi A Mehrabi F. Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus
lithorex-B as medical expulsive therapy following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteric stones; a
randomized clinical trial. J Nephropharmacol. 2017;6(2):79-84. DOI: 10.15171/npj.2017.09

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 9864

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 4838

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 8

Your browser does not support the canvas element.